Free tool

FMEA Action Priority Calculator (S, O, D)

Enter severity, occurrence and detection. The calculator returns a High, Medium or Low action priority using severity-first precedence, shows the exact rule that produced it, and demonstrates why ranking by RPN misleads.

Action priority
precedence result
RPN (for contrast)
S × O × D

Runs entirely in your browser. Nothing is uploaded, stored, or sent anywhere.

Why RPN was retired

For decades FMEA teams ranked risk by the risk priority number: severity times occurrence times detection. It is an appealing idea and a bad one, because multiplication throws away exactly the information that matters. A severity of 10 with an occurrence of 2 and a detection of 5 gives 100. So does a severity of 5, an occurrence of 4 and a detection of 5. The first is a potential safety or regulatory failure; the second is an annoyance. Treated as equal, they get the same attention, and the queue gets worked from the top of a list that is sorted by the wrong thing.

The replacement is a precedence rule rather than a product. Severity is considered first, because a severe effect deserves attention even when the cause is rare. Occurrence is considered second. Detection is considered last, because detection is the weakest of the three: catching a problem later is worth much less than not causing it, and detection ratings are the most optimistically scored of the three in practice.

The output is not a number to sort by. It is a High, Medium or Low action priority, and each carries an obligation. High means the team acts or documents why not. Medium means it should act or record why the current controls suffice. Low means it may act, and should still record the rationale. Nothing is ever silently dropped.

About this implementation. The authoritative action-priority table is published in the AIAG-VDA FMEA Handbook and is copyrighted, so this tool does not reproduce it. What it applies instead is the precedence principle — severity first, then occurrence, then detection — with our own thresholds, and it shows you the exact rule that fired for every result so you can see what it did rather than trust it. Treat the output as a sanity check and a teaching aid. If you are running a formal AIAG-VDA FMEA, rank against the handbook's table; the two will usually agree, and where they differ the handbook wins.

Reading the three scales honestly

Where this fits

FMEA and FMEDA review is one of our primary service lines. The most common finding in a review is not arithmetic at all — it is that severity has been argued down to make a number look better, or that actions were recorded with no verification that they closed the risk. A review runs one to two weeks and ends in a written report you keep. For the hardware side of the same question, the FMEDA rollup calculator shows where your quantitative metrics are being spent.

More free tools

Each of these runs entirely in your browser. Nothing is uploaded, stored or sent anywhere, and none of them needs an email address.

ASIL determination →
Severity, exposure and controllability to an ASIL, with the reasoning shown.
FIT & PMHF budget →
Failure rate and diagnostic coverage to SPFM, LFM and PMHF for one element.
FMEDA rollup →
Many elements rolled up to system SPFM, LFM and PMHF, ranked by contribution.
Solder joint fatigue →
Coffin-Manson thermal cycling life, scaled from a qualification test.

See all 49 engineering tools →

Stay in touch

New tools and notes, once a month at most

We add tools here fairly often and write up the things worth writing up — a stackup that behaved oddly, a standard that turned out to be obsolete, a calculator that was quietly wrong. Join and you get told when something new lands.

One email a month at the very most, and usually less. No drip sequence, no sales cadence, no sharing your address with anyone. Unsubscribe whenever you like.

Join the list →

Talk to us about a review →