Check a design against typical fabricator capability bands before it gets quoted. Annular ring, aspect ratio, drill-to-copper and BGA escape — and which single parameter is pushing the whole board into a more expensive class.
| Check | Yours | Capability limit | Verdict |
|---|
Runs entirely in your browser. Nothing is uploaded, stored, or sent anywhere.
Fabricators price in capability bands. A design that stays inside the standard band is cheap, high-yield and quick; step outside on a single parameter and the whole board moves up a class. The cost is rarely proportional to how far you exceeded it — a 4 mil trace on an otherwise 5 mil board costs the same premium as a board that is 4 mil throughout.
So the useful check is not "will they make it" but "which single parameter is pushing the whole board into a more expensive class". That is usually one thing, and it is usually fixable.
The ring is what remains of the pad once the drill has gone through it, and the drill does not land perfectly centred — layers shift during lamination and drilling has its own tolerance. A ring that is generous on paper can break out in production, which is why fabricators quote a minimum: it is really a statement about their registration accuracy.
Pad diameter minus drill diameter, divided by two, is the ring per side. Increasing the pad is free until it starts eating routing space, which is exactly where BGA escape gets difficult.
Plating has to deposit copper down the full depth of the hole, and the deeper and narrower it is, the harder that becomes. Beyond roughly 8:1 on a standard process the plating thins in the middle of the barrel. That is not a cosmetic issue: a thin barrel is a reliability defect you cannot inspect, and it typically appears as an intermittent open after thermal cycling — long after the board passed test.
A thicker board with the same drill makes this worse. If you are running 0.2 mm vias through 2.4 mm of board, that is 12:1 and needs a fabricator who has said yes in writing.
Whether you can route a trace between adjacent via pads is a fixed sum: pitch, minus pad diameter, gives the gap; the gap has to hold a trace and two clearances. If it does not fit, you cannot escape that row on that layer — and the answer is more layers, smaller pads, or an HDI process with microvias in the pad.
Working this out before layout is what stops a 0.5 mm pitch BGA quietly turning a 6-layer board into a 10-layer one halfway through routing.
Each of these runs entirely in your browser. Nothing is uploaded, stored or sent anywhere, and none of them needs an email address.
See all 49 engineering tools →
We add tools here fairly often and write up the things worth writing up — a stackup that behaved oddly, a standard that turned out to be obsolete, a calculator that was quietly wrong. Join and you get told when something new lands.
One email a month at the very most, and usually less. No drip sequence, no sales cadence, no sharing your address with anyone. Unsubscribe whenever you like.